Home

EMBARGOED UNTIL: 12.01am Thursday 19th March 2009
APPOINTMENT AS QUEEN’S COUNSEL:
2009-10 COMPETITION ANNOUNCED

The Selection Panel for appointing Queen’s Counsel has announced today that it is inviting applications from barristers and solicitors with Higher Courts advocacy rights for appointment as Queen’s Counsel from Thursday 19th March 2009.

From Thursday 19th March 2009, the application form and guidance for applicants will be available on the Selection Panel’s website www.qcapplications.org.uk . The deadline for receipt of applications is 5 pm on Thursday 23rd April 2009. On current expectations the outcome of the applications is likely to be announced in the early part of 2010.

The Selection Panel will be looking for applicants who demonstrate 5 competencies to a standard of excellence, on the same basis as in the 2008-09 competition. The competencies are:

A. Understanding and use of the law
B. Oral and written advocacy (including the preparation and court or resolution aspects of advocacy).
C. Working with others
D. Diversity
E. Integrity

The award is for excellence in advocacy in the higher courts and equivalent tribunals, and arbitrations. Advocacy includes both written and oral advocacy. There is no minimum amount of in court or written advocacy required for an applicant to be successful, provided there is enough evidence for the Selection Panel to reach a
conclusion as to excellence.

To be appointed an applicant must demonstrate the competencies to a standard of excellence. Applicants are required to provide a summary description of their practice, a self assessment as to how they meet the competencies and the names of assessors who have recently encountered them at work – judges or arbitrators, fellow practitioners
and professional clients or client proxies. The Selection Panel will consider the evidence from the summary description of practice, self assessment and assessments and decide on the strength of the available evidence which applicants justify an interview.

The Selection Panel has nine members with a substantial lay (i.e. non-lawyer) membership. It is also chaired by a non-lawyer. The Selection Panel is independent of  the legal professions and Government. Four new members of the Selection Panel are currently being recruited.

The Selection Panel’s recommendations will be passed to the Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, who will put recommendations to The Queen. The Lord Chancellor has no power to veto names or to add names of his own. The Scheme is funded entirely by fees from applicants.

Ends
Notes to Editors
1. Further information from David Watts, Head of QC Appointments Secretariat 020 7831 0020.
2. Sir Paul Kennedy, Professor Dame Joan Higgins DBE, Lucy Scott-Moncrieff, Jean Ritchie QC and Karamjit Singh CBE will continue to be members of the Selection Panel during the 2009-10 competition. The recruitment for four new members of the Selection Panel is expected to be completed shortly.
3. The document setting out the principles and mechanics of the process was agreed in 2004 and modified in 2006 by the Bar Council, Law Society and the (then) Department for Constitutional Affairs. A copy of this and other information is available on the QCA website www.qcapplications.org.uk.
4. The scheme is entirely self-financing. To cover the costs of the process applicants have to pay an application fee of £2350 (+VAT). This fee is reduced from £2500 (+VAT) in the previous competition. There will be a further appointment fee of £3500 (+ VAT) paid by successful applicants only.

PRESS RELEASE
EMBARGOED UNTIL 00:01 19 FEBRUARY 2009
104 QUEEN’S COUNSEL APPOINTED IN 2008/09 COMPETITION

The third round of appointments as Queen’s Counsel was announced today. These appointments are made by an independent Selection Panel, which recommends who should receive this highly sought-after award. All those appointed have demonstrated excellence in advocacy in the higher courts. Baroness Butler-Sloss, Interim Chairman of the QC Selection Panel, said today:

I have the pleasure of announcing these 104 names. All applicants are assessed against a common competency framework and the same standard of excellence and it is encouraging to see that a wide variety of advocates are among those whose appointment is announced today. There are no quotas, and we treat all applications in the same way, but the range of appointments reflects the openness and fairness of the selection process.

On this occasion, the Selection Panel made two significant improvements to the scheme, firstly by inviting applicants to describe the nature of their particular practice in their self-assessment and secondly by looking specifically at both
preparation for, and resolution of, disputes in relation to written and oral advocacy.

Although I applaud the achievement of all those whose appointment was announced today there are four categories of applicant which I would like to single out for special mention:

Employed Barristers: I know there have been concerns at the employed bar that the current selection arrangements are not for them. Our process is for any advocate whatever their employment status who can demonstrate excellence in written or oral advocacy in the higher courts. This year only two employed barristers applied, but I am delighted to say that they have both been appointed. I hope that this will encourage other suitable employed advocates to apply in the future.

Solicitor Advocates: This year only 4 solicitor advocates applied, but of these 3 (75%) have been appointed. Again I hope this will encourage solicitor advocates with the appropriate experience to apply in the future Women: For the third year running the success rate for women applicants is significantly better than for men: 55% for women compared 40% for men. It is particularly disappointing therefore that fewer women seem to be applying for
Silk, resulting in fewer appointments.

Ethnic minorities: As last year there are four appointments of applicants declaring an ethnic origin other than white.
I would hope that potential applicants from these groups will be heartened by these successes. I would encourage suitably qualified applicants from under represented groups to apply, and I hope that those who work with well qualified practitioners, whatever their background, to apply for Silk when they judge the time is right.

All our decisions have been based solely on the evidence before the Selection Panel on this occasion. The list is composed as it is because that is where the evidence led us.

I should like to congratulate the new QCs. I also have an important message for those applicants who were not successful on this occasion.

The standard for appointment is very high. If you have not The 104 (42% of all applicants) appointed this year included:
• 16 women applicants (55% of the 29 who applied). This was the highest ever success rate for women applicants.
• 4 applicants who declared an ethnic origin other than white (27% of the 15 who applied). There were 4 such appointments in 2007-08 (18% of the 22 who applied).
• 3 solicitor advocates (75% of the 4 who applied). This was the highest ever success rate for solicitor applicants. Previous high was 33% (4 appointments in 2006-07 and 2 appointments in 1997 (33%)
• 2 employed barristers (100% of the 2 who applied). These were the first employed barristers to be appointed by the Selection Panel.

• 5 applicants aged 55 or over (20% of this age group) as at the closing date for applications in April 2008.

Ends
Notes to Editors
1. Queen’s Counsel are appointed by The Queen, on the advice of the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice. He is in turn advised by an independent Selection Panel which receives and considers each application and
makes recommendations as to appointment.
2. Sir Duncan Nichol resigned as Chairman of the Panel on 3rd April 2008. Baroness Butler-Sloss agreed to be the Interim Chairman for the 2008-09 competition on 23rd May 2008. She will be replaced for the next round once a new lay Chair has been recruited.
3. The members of the independent Queen’s Counsel Selection Panel are:

Baroness Butler-Sloss GBE (Interim Chairman)
Roy Amlot QC
Ruth Evans
Professor Dame Joan Higgins DBE
Sir Paul Kennedy
Jean Ritchie QC
Lucy Scott-Moncrieff
Karamjit Singh CBE
Christopher Woolley.
The Panel is supported by its own Secretariat.

4. The new scheme was developed by the Bar Council and the Law Society, with the support of the (then) Department for Constitutional Affairs, and approved by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State (Lord Falconer) in November 2004. Refinements to the scheme were similarly agreed in 2006 building on experience of the first year. A copy of the agreed Process and further information is available from the Queen’s Counsel Appointments website: www.qcapplications.org.uk

5. Applications closed on 3
rd April 2008 and the Selection Panel delivered its
recommendations to the Secretary of State for Justice on 11th December 2008.
Each applicant has been considered against five competencies:
• Understanding and using the law
• Oral and written advocacy
• Working with others
• Diversity
• Integrity
172 of the 247 applicants were interviewed by the Selection Panel. All unsuccessful applicants are receiving personal l feedback on their applications.

6. The new Queen’s Counsel announced today will formally become Silks when they make their declaration before the Lord Chancellor at the ceremony on Monday 30th March 2009.

7. Copies of the Selection Panel’s report are also available on the QCA website. Further information can also be obtained from David Watts, Head of QC Appointments Secretariat 0207 831 0020.